Your paper, read like a reviewer reads it.
Waraq checks your manuscript against your target journal's own rules and returns native Word tracked changes, every one cited. You accept or reject each, inside Word.
Meet Reviewer 2. Before the journal does.
Waraq reads your manuscript like the harshest reviewer, then hands you every fix as real Word tracked changes. In minutes, not months.
Every fix, as real Word edits.
Every change cites a real rule.
Reviewed while your coffee's hot.
Reviewed against your target journal.
Still your words, still your paper.
Built to get past the desk.
What comes back to your desk.
Not a chat transcript. A reviewed file with tracked changes you accept or reject inside Word, findings cited to your journal's rules, a score you can defend, and a reviewer you can question.
The results suggest the intervention was very effective associated with a 23% improvement across all cohorts, although attrition in the control group was not fully reported is reported in Table S2.
Quantify the effect size; replace the qualitative claim.
Report attrition for every arm. Now cited to Table S2.
Ready to resubmit after 14 accepted changes.
Why flag the attrition sentence?
PRISMA 2020 §17 asks for attrition reported in every arm. Your counts already exist in Table S2, so the revision cites them and the journal's reviewer never has to go looking.
PRISMA 2020 · §17Three ways in.
One system for the whole arc of a paper: the review that fixes it, the booklet that teaches it, the community that reads it before the journal does.
A review system, not a reply.
Real Word tracked changes, every one cited to your target journal's own rules.
Publish your first paper, step by step.
The booklet: from first draft to acceptance, and the mistakes that trigger desk rejection.
A community that matches your level.
Your Waraq Score places you with researchers at your stage. You get matched, not networked.
The work, in motion.
Every rule checked. Every rejection headed off. Minutes, not months.
Matched against 15,000 journals. Not a guess.
Waraq is trained on the published rules of over fifteen thousand journals. Paste your abstract or a topic, and it ranks the ones that actually fit, then reviews your paper against the winner's exact guidelines.
Every match is scored against the journal's real scope, method preferences, and formatting rules, not a keyword guess. Pick one, and the review runs against its exact guidelines.
Matched to your field. Not a feed.
We are building the community the opposite of a timeline. We segment by field, scope, and level, so when you join we place you with researchers close to your discipline, at your stage. You review each other's drafts and push each other toward published papers.
Your discipline
Your discipline and sub-area, not a generic pool.
Your method
Your method, topic, and stage of work.
A step ahead
Master's to professor, reviewed by peers a step ahead.
When it helps
Your city and language, when it helps you connect.
In Health Sciences, we place you with researchers at your level and scope, to co-review drafts and push toward publication.
A companion that never closes your file.
The Research Agent reads the literature in your field, surfaces the gaps worth writing into, targets the journals that fit, and feeds it all straight back into the review loop.
No study pairs this method with your population.
Learn to publish, with your community.
Courses, cohorts, and the craft of getting past review, built on Waraq. One reviewer told us it found the two things her supervisor always finds, before her supervisor did.
One email when it opens. Nothing else.A review system, measured.
Start this week. Publish this year.
One plan, two review modes. A fast Desk Review to screen a clean draft, a deep Peer Review when the argument needs a senior reader. Less than one submission fee.
The desk editor's first screen. Formatting, citation style, structure, and reference completeness against your target journal, returned as tracked changes in seconds.
A senior reviewer's read. Argument, evidence, method soundness, and the gaps that trigger a revise or reject, each point cited to a rule. Our best AI models, for the papers that matter.
It reads the draft first: a Desk Review for a clean paper, a Peer Review when the argument needs work. You spend your deep reviews only where they count.
How it works: a Desk Review is a quick pass, a Peer Review is a full read. Your plan includes both and refills automatically.
Your manuscript, reviewed.
Waraq edits your writing. It does not write for you. Upload your paper and see results in minutes.